In Andrew's post "The Case Against Bush" claims that he has not read a more case than the one laid out by William Saletan. Andrew, Andrew, baby, sweetheart...I realize the Marriage thing is dear to you heart but I think it is starting to cloud your judgement. The article is full of the standard clap trap. Such as:
He figured that since both Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden were evil, they had to be connected. Saddam must have helped orchestrate the 9/11 attacks. He must have built weapons of mass destruction to sell to al-Qaida.And this:
That's why, under his plan, the size of the tax cut was to grow from year to year. The point was to keep the surplus from piling up, refunding more and more money as it poured in from a growing economy. That's also why Bush cut taxes across the board instead of targeting middle-class families who would spend the money immediately. He wasn't trying to stimulate the economy. He was trying to give the money back to the people who had paid it in, which meant largely the rich.Come on Andrew we all know you are smarter than that.